Recently in Cleaning Products Category

Daniel Goldman sums up many of the key aspects of green consumer behaviors in this overview of his book, "Ecological Intelligence".

Incremental improvements in our product choices, and product design will add up to a generational "world view" shift that leaves a healthier system in place for our old age...and our children.

Goldman explains the choices we can make to improve the health of our business system, and our environment on which we depend for life support.

DfE Partners and Recognized Products

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Through manufacture and use, virtually everyone comes in contact with the chemicals in these products, which are ultimately released to the environment--as effluents to water, off-gases to air, and solid wastes to land. By forming partnerships with the DfE Program, formulators can take part in an important national effort to improve the human health and environmental profile of chemical-based products, which will benefit the quality of aquatic life and the environment, the biodegradability of waste streams, and human health and safety.

The basis for a DfE partnership rests on the selection of the safest possible ingredients that permit the formulation of high-performing, cost-effective products. DfE can provide formulators with information on chemical characteristics and toxicities of raw materials and additives, safer substitutes for chemicals of concern, and innovative new chemistries. The DfE document "Criteria for Safer Cleaning Products (CSCP) in the form of a Standard" (PDF) (28 pp, 157K) describes the program's unique approach to product review and formulation improvement. To view this criteria in matrix form, please click here [considerations for partnership (PDF) (12 pp, 161K)]. DfE Formulator partners enjoy Agency recognition, including the use of the DfE label on products with improved formulations.
Look for the DfE Label!
Design for the Environment Label

Safer Products

Design for the Environment Label


DfE-recognized products are safer for people and the planet and have eliminated more than 270 million pounds of chemicals of concern.

SDSI Logo




Safer Products

Safer Detergent Stewardship Initiative
To share the DfE thinking on safer formulations with the widest possible audience and to make forming partnerships easier, DfE sponsored CleanGredients®, a database of safer cleaning product ingredients. Organized by product component class (e.g., surfactants, solvents, etc.), CleanGredients™ creates a green marketplace where formulators can select functionally appropriate ingredients that pass the DfE Screen for safer chemicals.

The redesign of chemical products offers important opportunities to:

  • Remove polluting chemicals from formulations before they can enter the workplace, home, or environment.
  • Advance energy and water efficiency, resource conservation, and innovative technologies.
  • Qualify for environmentally preferred product status, increasingly sought by government, retailer and consumer purchasers.
For more information, contact DfE.
U.S. EPA

Each year, formulators blend billions of pounds of chemical ingredients to create a wide variety of products used by businesses, institutions, households, and others. Through manufacture and use, virtually everyone comes in contact with the chemicals in these products, which are ultimately released to the environment--as effluents to water, off-gases to air, and solid wastes to land.


By forming partnerships with the DfE Program, formulators can take part in an important national effort to improve the human health and environmental profile of chemical-based products, which will benefit the quality of aquatic life and the environment, the biodegradability of waste streams, and human health and safety.

NSF INTERNATIONAL, Third Party Reviews for DfE Formulator Program

NSF International  has partnered with the U.S. EPA's Design for the Environment program ("DfE") to perform third-party reviews for the DfE Formulator Program.

NSF International has been selected to prepare product ingredient profiles for partnership candidates. NSF reviews cleaning product formulations for its environmental and human health profiles using criteria developed by DfE. Once successfully reviewed, formulators may be recognized by DfE and use the DfE logo on their products.

DfE offers recognition to formulators who design products for the environment and human health by using safer chemicals.


SOURCE: NSF

CleanGredients® Data Verification

logo

NSF International is pleased to announce it has partnered with the GreenBlue Institute and CleanGredients® to perform third-party reviews of surfactant ingredients. Once successfully reviewed, surfactants may be listed on the CleanGredients website, the industry resource for formulators.

NSF reviews ingredient formulations for aquatic toxicity and biodegradability using criteria defined by the U.S. EPA DfE (Design for the Environment) Program, which designates surfactants with especially positive environmental characteristics.

CleanGredients.org is an online database of institutional and industrial (I&I) cleaning ingredients that:

  • Helps formulators identify ingredients that have potential environmental and/or human health and safety benefits.
  • Provides an opportunity for manufacturers and producers of cleaning ingredients to showcase their ingredients with potential environmental and/or human health and safety benefits.
SOURCE:  NSF International

Writing about complex scientific stories isn't easy, and takes years of both study and research.  These two investigative reporters have been honored for their dedication.

Susanne Rust & Meg Kissinger

Rust and Kissinger


Chemical Fallout
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Thirty years ago, a carcinogenic flame-retardant material was taken out of children's pajamas.  In 2008 it was being used with frequency in products such as baby carriers and bassinetts.  This was just one of several discoveries made by Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in their series, "Chemical Fallout."

The team exposed government programs that favored chemical makers over the public and conflicts of interests among regulators.  Rust and Kissinger reported that there was no such thing as "microwave-safe" plastics. An outside laboratory tested containers labeled as such and found toxic levels of chemicals leached from every item.

The Journal Sentinel team did their homework: They reviewed hundreds of scientific journal articles and worked with scientists to determine that the federal government's assurances that bisphenol A (a chemical compound found in many plastics) is safe are based on outdated U.S. government studies and research heavily funded by the chemical industry. PBS broadcaster Bill Moyers compared the reporting to the legendary Upton Sinclair. David Kessler, former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, said that the Sentinel was doing the work that the agency should have been doing all along to protect the public.


Susanne Rust

Senior Reporter, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Susanne Rust was part of a reporting team that won the 2008 Sigma Delta Chi award and the Society of American Business Writers and Editors award for detailing chemical dangers and lax regulations in Washington, D.C. The team also won the 2008 John B. Oakes Award.  Rust has continued to break new ground throughout 2008 with more stories exposing the failures of the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration.  In her five years at the Sentinel, Rust has also trekked through the hills of Rwanda to cover stories on civil engineering and AIDS; hacked through the dense foliage of a Ugandan rain forest in search of mountain gorillas; poked around Scotland's Roslin Institute looking for clones; and written about eco-friendly agriculture in Costa Rica.  Before joining the Sentinel, Rust pursued a doctorate in biological anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Meg Kissinger

Investigative Reporter, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Meg Kissinger is the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's investigative reporter focusing on health and welfare.  She and two of her colleagues won the 2008 Sigma Delta Chi award and the Society of American Business Writers and Editors Award for a series of articles on the government's failure to screen for dangerous chemicals in household products.  The series also won the 2008 John B. Oakes Award.  Kissinger has spent the last year breaking new ground on the failures of the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration to regulate toxic chemicals.  She was a finalist for the 2007 Selden Ring and Investigative Reporters and Editors awards for her reports on the filthy and dangerous housing conditions in Milwaukee County for people with mental illness. That series won the Mental Health America Award for best news repoting.  In her 25 years in the newsroom, Kissinger has written about abuses in the nursing home industry, the scam of the door-to-door magazine sales industry and the travails of an oncologist who unwittingly discovered his own end-stage cancer.  

Dry Cleaning Without Toxic Chemicals

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
The chemical used to dry clean many clothes is perchloroethylene (perc).

Perc is bad for the environment, a health hazard for those who work in dry cleaning facilities and a problem for communities where dry cleaners are located. Studies have also shown that consumers can suffer adverse health effects from exposure to perc.

Perc is a chlorinated chemical solvent that usually enters the body through the respiratory system or skin; less often, it is ingested via contaminated food or water. Like many other chlorinated hydrocarbons, perc accumulates in the body's fatty tissue. It can cause nervous system damage, liver and kidney damage, several types of cancer and reproductive harm (perc passes easily from the mother to the fetus). Nursing mothers who are occupationally exposed or who live in apartments over dry cleaning establishments have enough perc in their breast milk to put their infants at risk, according to Ted Schettler, M.D., M.P.H., editor of Generations At Risk (MIT Press, 1998).

Alternative: Wet Cleaning
www.ucsusa.org/publications/greentips/1000-wet-cleaning.html
The Union of Concerned Scientists, an independent nonprofit alliance of more than 100,000 concerned citizens and scientists, promote this safe and healthy alternative to dry cleaning.

 

Really Clean Schools for Our Children's Health

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Children are regularly exposed to environmental toxins in and around schools and day care centers. These exposures generally come from cleaning products, pesticides and diesel exhaust from school buses while they are idling outside the school as well as in transit.

Grassroots Environmental Education provides a comprehensive ChildSafe School program designed to help parents, teachers and administrators reduce or eliminate  toxins in schools. 


CLEANING PRODUCTS

Unlike homes, schools are cleaned every twenty-four hours, and as children sprawl on desks, cafeteria tables and floors, they come into direct contact with the products used to clean those surfaces. In schools with limited fresh air the cleaning process can also create indoor air quality problems. Many of the most commonly used cleaners and disinfectants contain chemicals that are known to cause both acute and long term health problems.

The Childsafe Guidelines are designed to help school administrators and facilities directors choose cleaning products which are healthy and safe for children. To view a list of products that meet these guidelines, click here.

PESTICIDES Most school districts employ some type of regular pest control, including the use of insecticides for indoor pest problems and turf care pesticides for playing fields. Although many schools nationwide are moving towards reducing their dependence on pesticides through Integrated Pest Management (IPM), the use of pesticides in and around schools is still one of the most significant health risks for children.

DIESEL EXHAUST New studies show that children are at risk from exposure to diesel exhaust on school buses, waiting to board while school buses are idling, and inside schools where the exhaust has entered through doors and windows. Diesel exhaust contains more than 40 chemicals listed as hazardous air pollutants under the Clean Air Act, including chemicals that cause cancer, respiratory illnesses and birth defects. Recent studies confirmed that exposure to diesel exhaust is associated with an increase in the frequency and severity of asthma attacks. Nearly 4.8 million school children suffer from asthma.

RESOURCES

Environment and Human Health, Inc.  has an impressive report called Children's Exposure to Diesel Exhaust on School Buses and a flyer called Twelve Steps Toward a Healthier School a guide to the potential hazards in school environments. www.ehhi.org

Beyond Pesticides is a non-profit that publishes a  bulletin called the School Pesticide Monitor and offers a comprehensive step-by-step guide called Building Blocks for School IPM  www.beyondpesticides.org or www.toxicfreeschools.org

Grassroots Environmental Education
Port Washington, NY 11050 •
(p) 516-883-0887

http://www.grassrootsinfo.org

Categories